M. Uchijima
To Win
O. Jabeur
To Win
Ons Jabeur vs Qiang Wang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L L L W L
Form
L L L W W L L L L LHead To Head: Jabeur 1 - 2 Wang
They have played 6 sets in total, with Jabeur winning 2 and Wang winning 4. The last match between Jabeur and Wang was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 26-01-2020, Fourth, Hard with Ons Jabeur getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ons Jabeur | 1 |
| Qiang Wang | 2 |
Australian Open - Melbourne(26-01-2020)
7
6
6
1
| Jabeur | Stats | Wang |
|---|---|---|
| 60% (12-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 28 | Ranking | 421 |
| 2 | Highest Rank | 12 |
| 30 | Age | 33 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 16 | Titles | 17 |
| 65% (465-254) | Career Total W/L | 59% (418-288) |
| $10,993,507 | Career Prize Money | $3,853,637 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 2 |
Upcoming Match
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Quinn VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-1 |
Stats 
Ons Jabeur
Player
Qiang Wang
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| 6-0 6-3 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Ons Jabeur
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
84%
(
16 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
||||
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Ons Jabeur
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 20 | Games Won | 31 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:6:14 | Average Match Time | 1:6:14 |
| 59% (85/145) | 1st Serve % | 62% (102/165) |
| 54% (46/85) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (70/102) |
| 47% (28/60) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (35/63) |
| 35% (7/20) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 65% (13/20) |
| 36% (60/165) | Return Points Win % | 49% (71/145) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ons Jabeur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Ons Jabeur
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve %
75%
(
12 of
16)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
43%
(
12 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
22
Total Points Won
22
|
4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ons Jabeur
Player
Katerina Siniakova
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dayana Yastremska
Player
Ons Jabeur
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
45%
(
22 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Ons Jabeur
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Ons Jabeur
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Ons Jabeur
Player
Sofia Kenin
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ons Jabeur
Player
Qinwen Zheng
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ons Jabeur
Player
Mccartney Kessler
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Rybakina
Player
Ons Jabeur
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
109)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
46 of
109)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ons Jabeur
Player
Wakana Sonobe
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Qiang Wang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Qiang Wang
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jessika Ponchet
Player
Qiang Wang
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
7
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Qiang Wang
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alycia Parks
Player
Qiang Wang
55%
(
42 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
53 of
93)
7
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
31%
(
11 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
1-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Kudashova
Player
Qiang Wang
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve %
44%
(
11 of
25)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
7 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
29
Total Points Won
19
|
6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Xichen Zhao
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Ruien Zhang
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
41%
(
22 of
54)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
56
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Qiang Wang
46%
(
34 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Qiang Wang
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Han Shi
Player
Qiang Wang
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
62
|
3-6 6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (465/254) | Win/Loss | 59% (418/288) |
| 61% (1016/637) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (942/670) |
| 54% (8208/6929) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7805/6790) |
| 58% (185/136) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (314/194) |
| 71% (151/63) | Clay Win/Loss | 49% (35/36) |
| 64% (56/32) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (48/39) |
| 76% (73/23) | Grass Win/Loss | 53% (21/19) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1915 | Aces Total | 1071 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1504 | Total Double Faults | 990 |
| 1:7:19 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 384.07 | Average Opponent Rank | 511.14 |
| 55% (20775/37800) | 1st Serve % | 63% (18109/28953) |
| 67% (13879/20775) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (11452/18109) |
| 47% (8047/17015) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (5139/10838) |
| 48% (2212/4643) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1751/3703) |
| 45% (17168/38086) | Return Points Win % | 45% (13247/29236) |
| 66% (82/42) | Slam W/L | 51% (34/33) |
| 56% (72/57) | Masters W/L | 53% (44/39) |
| 67% (2/1) | Cups W/L | 73% (19/7) |
| 61% (133/85) | Main Tour W/L | 51% (96/92) |
| 71% (146/61) | Challenger W/L | 65% (198/107) |
| 78% (29/8) | Futures W/L | 73% (27/10) |
| 65% (457/705) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (412/692) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (4/8) |
| 57% (103/181) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (61/124) |
| 59% (136/229) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (95/198) |
| 90% (438/394) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (434/373) |
| 10% (438/44) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (434/60) |
| 25% (280/71) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (272/45) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
